Search for: "US v. Spears" Results 221 - 240 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2012, 7:33 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
 These panels included high-profile private plaintiffs’ attorneys, like Joseph Sellers, who represents the employees in the Dukes v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
If not quite yet paraded in orange boiler suits, the book leaves us in no doubt that would-be libel and privacy litigants in the US find themselves in a remedy-less legal vacuum forced to seek extra-territorial redress. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 8:12 am by Jeanine Cali
Visitors often look quizzically at the inscriptions because, where they would expect to see the letter “u,” they see “v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Since an arbitrator's award ordinarily will not be vacated even if founded upon errors of law and/or fact (see Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, 479-480 [2006], cert dismissed 548 US 940 [2006]), there is no basis to vacate this award founded upon applicable contract principles (see Szabados v Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. of N.Y., 191 AD2d 367 [1993]). [read post]
19 May 2012, 7:53 am by Paul Jacobson
Here is an extract of her column which is worth reading in its entirety: Did we think the image of President Jacob Zuma by Brett Murray was particularly beautiful to persuade us to publish it? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 3:18 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Furthermore, no attempt to effectuate service was made at the defendant's actual "dwelling place or usual place of abode" (JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v Iancu Pizza, Ltd., 78 AD3d at 903 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Earle v Valente, 302 AD2d at 353), nor did the process server make genuine inquiries to ascertain the defendant's actual residence or place of employment (see McSorley v Spear, 50 AD3d 652, 654; Estate of Edward S. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:22 am
Govern, Operation Neptune Spear: Was Killing Bin Laden a Legitimate Military Objective? [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:30 am
 The article by Catherine Dunn in the Corporate Counsel site confirms a number of points in an earlier post of mine, including the use of "spear-phishing" to trick unsuspecting lawyers. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:01 pm by Ken
In Aggravation: V. snarky assholes. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 2:08 pm by Andrew Berger
That’s because on December 20, 2011, the Ninth Circuit held in UMG v. [read post]