Search for: "United States v. 20 CASES, ETC."
Results 221 - 240
of 622
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2018, 6:10 am
Let’s look at the facts of United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 8:49 am
” Next, it reviews the standards of “willfulness” as presented by the United States and taxpayer’s counsel, and as determined by the Court in the recent Miami, Florida case which was tried and decided by a jury in Miami, Florida in June, 2014, United States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 5:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:03 am
The plaintiff had argued that his case is based on the defendant's contractual obligations, and the libel law cases thus don't apply: Plaintiff argues this case is controlled by the United States Supreme Court's holding in Cohen v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
These cases follow the 2009 case, Padilla v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
The margin of appreciation is the wiggle-room which the Court may afford Member States over the implementation of the Convention, to take into account each States particularities (culture, history, etc.). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 57 Cal. 2d 450, 455, 20 Cal. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Part IV examines the three major state supreme court cases involving Bowie knives: In Georgia, Nunn v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 7:06 pm
Take, for example, State v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 7:19 am
State regulators across the country have expressed concern that mobile dental units will be used to collect as much money as possible while leaving dangerous conditions untreated. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am
Split process into looking at unopposed v. new proposals/data. [read post]
10 May 2020, 5:04 am
The European Court of Human Rights takes a broad (or “autonomous”) view of what amounts to a possession: Gasus Dosier-und Fordertechnik GmbH v Netherlands (1995) 20 E.H.R.R. 403; Beyler v Italy (2001) 33 E.H.R.R. 52. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:37 am
So every time a relative sues to try to get damages for the death of a relative in the United States, those are all statutory. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:12 am
The second question was subject to the CJEU referral in the Nokia v Daimler (see previous posts here), but which has so far remained unanswered in Europe. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 8:19 am
Section 1415, etc.) [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 9:31 am
The reason for the issuance was stated as “quit. [read post]
20 Jul 2013, 10:39 am
This paper considers societal constitutionalism in its dynamic element—as a system structures constant adjustment among the constituting elements of a governance unit (whether state, corporation, religion, etc.) [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
He considered (applying PG v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 51) that REP was a significant but not necessarily conclusive factor in deciding whether Article 8 was engaged. [read post]
