Search for: "United States v. American Employers Insurance Co." Results 221 - 240 of 334
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
”  If the Secretary believes Section 11(c)(1) was violated, “[the Secretary] shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Among other criticisms, Richardson states that when officers went to her house to retrieve her vehicle, she did not come to the door. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
American United Life Insurance Company 13-536Issue: Whether the court below erroneously held, in conflict with the decisions of six other circuits, that a person who exercises some authority or control over the assets of an ERISA plan is a fiduciary with respect to that plan only if he is alleged to have “mismanaged” the plan’s assets. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am by William Ford, Victoria Gallegos
The committee will hear testimony from Luis Almagro, secretary general of the Organization of American States; Deborah Ulmer, regional director for Latin America and the Caribbean at the National Democratic Institute; and Ryan Berg, fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 10:11 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
IDR Process Suspended The IDR process currently is suspended following the August 3 , 2023 ruling by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Texas Medical Association v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
He also gutted funding for the United Nations Population Fund, which provides family planning services globally.He then crafted a “domestic gag rule” that imposed the same restrictions on organizations in the United States, something not done by previous Republican presidents. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employersyand fiduciaries of 401(k) plans should take note of the potential need to adopt a mid-year amendment to their plans to comply with new guidance of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) concerning the need to timely amend their plans to comply with IRS recent guidance on when their plans must afford same-sex partners treatment equivalent to opposite-sex married couples issued in response to the Supreme Court’s decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in… [read post]