Search for: "United States v. Appling"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,481
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2022, 12:51 am
There are three paragraphs that stress the "central objective of CADE's efforts" ("o objetivo central da atuação do Cade"), which is that of every competition authority in the civilized world: to protect, in the interest of consumer welfare, the competitive process ("concorrência") (as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit also emphasized in its FTC v. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 8:27 am
United States, No. 22-53 Lakshmi Arunachalam v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:17 pm
In this regard, they've made concessions lately--concession that in my view don't go far enough to address competition concerns, but which nevertheless represent (limited) progress.On June 10, 2022, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California formally approved (PDF) a class-action settlement between small app developers and Apple. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 11:04 am
Just this week I pointed to Antitrust Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter's testimony before the United States Senate. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:27 pm
At the Epic Games v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 2:16 am
The Pepper v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 1:27 am
Holger Kircher) will conduct a trial of an Apple v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 4:49 am
The specification expressly states that “an effective dose … can be from … about 480 mg to about 720 mg per day. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:27 am
Then the focus is on whether Apple abuse its aftermarket monopoly.I've previously explained in detail why Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California got the law, the economics, and the technology wrong with respect to the foremarket part. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 12:39 am
Apple litigation in the Northern District of California, the antitrust case that will be heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in one month from tomorrow, with the Department of Justice supporting Epic. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:35 pm
"ACT | The App Association is a small business with 20 employees in the United States and Belgium and is a 501(c)(6) [non-profit]. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 10:33 am
Apple are rooting for Epic.Ericsson and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (OUII, or "ITC staff"), which participates in United States International Trade Commission investigations as a third party protecting the public interest, insist on conducting discovery of the "monetary and nonmonetary consideration" Apple provides to ACT, which filed a "public" interest statement in support of Apple. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
That's the day on which the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit will hear the parties' cross-appeal in San Francisco. [read post]
17 Sep 2022, 5:30 am
A few days ago, Apple submitted to the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) a rebuttal report by its expert on French law in which I found an interesting hint at one of the positions apparently taken by Ericsson in the FRAND context. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 11:40 pm
In Epic Games v. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 3:55 pm
From Yeshiva Univ. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 4:48 am
Googlepotentially United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Notably, Romer and Romer’s study was completed with U.S. federal income tax data, not state level data. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 6:37 am
In connection with political elections--especially in the United States--the term "comeback kid" is often used for candidates who gain momentum after a difficult start, typically in situations in which many observers thought a campaign was over before it had really begun. [read post]
