Search for: "United States v. Bases"
Results 221 - 240
of 37,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2024, 8:55 pm
This approach rests upon a powerful policy basis that leads to superior innovation, macroeconomic outcomes, social cohesion and, therefore, superior national security for the United States. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:19 pm
State deficiencies in climate litigations and actions of judges Laurent Fonbaustier / Renaud Braillet 165 Part IV: Cities, States and Climate Change: Between Competition, Conflict and Cooperation Global climate governance turning translocal Delphine Misonne 181 America’s Climate Change Policy: Federalism in Action Daniel Esty 193 Local policies on climate change in a centralized State: The Example of France Camille… [read post]
13 May 2024, 1:59 pm
., filed a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:21 am
Blanford v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 7:36 am
Pruneyard-based First Amendment and public square-type argume [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:59 am
Facts – This case (Patterson v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:45 am
City of New York v. [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:55 am
In Citizens for Clean Air & Clean Water in Brazoria County et al v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Under FL HB 3, “financial institutions subject to the financial institutions codes” are required to provide annual attestations.[15] Because, as noted above, the Financial Institutions Codes “apply to all state-authorized or state-chartered financial institutions,”[16] based on a plain reading of the statute, only “state-authorized or state-chartered” financial institutions should be required to provide annual… [read post]
12 May 2024, 1:42 pm
VILER, Appellants, v. [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:46 am
United States that one cannot use the good-faith defense, especially when it’s based on an attorney’s counsel. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:31 pm
Washington, D.C. super-lawyer, Gene Schaerr, has filed an amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:45 am
See NCAA v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am
Union, Local 200 United, 19 NY3d 1009, 1011 [2012]; North Syracuse Cent. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the circuit split. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:30 am
Wade, Griswold v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:55 am
The Supreme Court is currently considering the meaning of “accrues” in the context of suing the United States government in Corner Post, Inc. v. [read post]
