Search for: "United States v. Berlin"
Results 221 - 240
of 337
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
In the Intercept, Glenn Greenwald draws attention to the fact that Amazon is itself involved in the building of a surveillance state. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 4:42 am
(Class 46) United States US General Can the ITC keep pace? [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
United States In the case of Fridman and ors v Bean LLC and Glenn Simpson (Case 17-20141 [pdf]) a Federal judge has refused a motion by the defendant to dismiss libel proceedings brought over over the Memoranda in the “Trump Dossier”. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
United States Wired suggests that the state of Utah has become a leader in digital privacy with the passing of a new privacy law. [read post]
12 May 2019, 4:36 pm
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
12 Feb 2023, 5:03 pm
United States Texas State Representative, Giovanni Capriglione, introduced a privacy bill to the state legislature which closely follows the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am
Berlin: Springer Verlag. 455-491. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 12:34 pm
The case was stayed while the United States Supreme Court decided Fed. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm
Since 2023, courts worldwide, including those in Australia, Canada, Germany, Mauritius, the Netherlands, Singapore, Switzerland, and the US, rendered decisions regarding whether to recognize the SCI Judgment and to allow it as a defence against the enforcement of arbitration awards.[1] This Insight analyzes these courts’ judgments and reflects on the decentralized judgment/award recognition and enforcement system for addressing alleged state retaliation measures. [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 1:00 pm
United Nations Human Rights CommitteeSusana v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm
What does Brexit mean for data protection: part 2 The Panopticon Blog has a post about the case of Campbell v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland [2018] UKUT 372 (AAC) – Death and the DPA. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:22 am
United States As mentioned above, Amber Heard’s bid for a retrial has been denied Former Attorney General Bill Barr has been subpoenaed by the court hearing the defamation case brought by Dominion Voting Systems against Fox News over claims the network aired defamatory claims about the company after the 2020 election. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 6:07 am
That allowed the United States and the U.K. to draw down and redirect their forces to Iraq and Afghanistan. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
(IPKat) Maximising IP and intangible assets: new report (IP finance) (Innovationpartners) Protecting developing countries through the Trips Agreement: What is the real state of play? [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
United States Melania Trump has attended a hearing in her libel case against a Maryland blogger apparently to show how serious she is about the case. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:53 am
It takes place 13-15 January organized by the Graduate Institute Geneva, and Humboldt University Berlin, as part of the research group OSAIC (Overlapping Spheres of Authority and Interface Conflicts in the Global Order) with special thanks to the organizational genius of Hannah Birkenkötter and Nico Krisch. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:49 pm
” Id. at *10.View #2: Modify CyborThe second approach, favored by some amici curiae including the United States, may be viewed as a fusion or hybrid of de novo review and deferential review. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 8:53 am
Wade is Garza v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 5:51 am
Instead, it is also about a persistent view of trade unions that predates the platform economy and efforts to avoid unionisation (as the extreme facts in United Steelworkers of America v Baron Metal Industries Inc illustrate). [read post]
