Search for: "United States v. Brewer"
Results 221 - 240
of 260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2008, 5:43 am
"[18] Significantly, anti-trust laws do not necessarily guarantee low prices, only the conditions that lead to them.[19] This distinction is intentional; the United States Supreme Court has recognized that while it may set the circumstances for achieving a fair price, the workings of a liberal market are better able to determine the fair price itself.[20] While anti-trust laws prohibit fixing maximum prices, the entire goal of the FPGPA is to accomplish… [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am
According to SCOTUS Watch, which “tracks the public statements made by United States senators about how they plan to vote,” 31 Republicans are “likely yes” and 16 (including McCain) are “definitely yes” on the confirmation. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:05 pm
Representative Publications: Brewer, Scott. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2014, 9:00 am
In Henry v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
In addition, as articulated in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 6:14 am
v=eTnHjYOFuB4"} ) CITIZENS UNITED WON'T GET SECOND LOOK Arizona's law wasn't all the high court tackled. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
In short, not even the most radical free marketeers on the Court, Brewer and Peckham, defended anything remotely approaching the laissez-faire jurisprudence advocated by the likes of treatise writer Christopher Tiedeman. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
In short, not even the most radical free marketeers on the Court, Brewer and Peckham, defended anything remotely approaching the laissez-faire jurisprudence advocated by the likes of treatise writer Christopher Tiedeman. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
She escaped to the United States and sought asylum. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 1:34 pm
The Tenth Amendment under full frontal Assault “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 2:42 pm
Rarely does the IPKat find a single illustration that so aptly combines two unrelated news items as on this occasion The United States has a unitary patent system that appears to cover all 50 States, together with the District of Columbia and a handful of other offshore locations. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:16 am
For example, in DeHoog v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 11:09 am
As a result of the 1973 case Gagnon v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
Supreme Court, March 19, 2008 Snyder v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 7:04 am
, (Daily Dose of IP), 26 August: WIPO symposium on IP and multilateral agreements – Geneva: (IPKat), 11-12 September: US LSI: 4th annual conference on ‘Current issues in complex IP licensing’ – Philadelphia: (Patent Docs), 11 September/15 October: PLI seminar on developments in pharmaceutical and biotech patent law – New York/San Francisco: (Patent Docs), 15-16 September: UniForum & SAIIPL domain name ADR workshop – Centurion (South… [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:54 am
Waitangi Day protest, 2006 (Photo by Flickr user Charlie Brewer, Feb. 6, 2006, used under Creative Commons License 2.0, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/). 1901: In Nireaha Tamaki v Baker, the Privy Council in London ruled that the courts did have jurisdiction to determine whether the land in dispute had been ceded to the Crown, in contrast to the approach that the New Zealand courts had taken since the Wi Parata case. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:24 am
Beverages Direct sold the product exclusively to retail purchasers located in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:49 pm
Representative Publications: Brewer, Scott. [read post]
