Search for: "United States v. Burke"
Results 221 - 240
of 360
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
Rogers, the United States Supreme Court held that the 14th Amendment does not categorically require the state to provide counsel for all indigent parents facing a civil contempt hearing for non-payment of child support where the other parent is also not represented by counsel. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 9:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 10:15 am
Hardsocg.Before GOLDEN, HILL, VOIGT, and BURKE, JJ., and CRANFILL, D.J.Date of Decision: December 9, 2011 Facts: Appellant operates three federal natural gas units. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 5:48 pm
Related posts:Forum Non Conveniens in US Courts On May 1, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals... [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:49 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 9:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 9:30 pm
Army Times reports that the IO in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 10:39 am
The headline alone suggests that United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 8:32 am
Likewise, the United States Constitution does not require counsel for indigent defendants seeking post-conviction relief. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:20 pm
1 (1978); United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 8:13 am
Burke delivered the opinion for the court. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:29 pm
TheRepulic reports on United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:13 am
A trial court’s duty to insure that a defendant understands the consequences of a guilty plea before he enters one extends only to direct consequences of such a plea.In addition, the United States Supreme Court, in Iowa v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
Autism: IN-SCHOOL AUTISM CARE COVERED, PENNSYLVANIA JUDGE SAYS, Burke v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:13 am
United States, 284 U.S. 299 (1932). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 8:27 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:54 am
In Part II, we highlight the potential proliferation of foreign judgments brought to the United States for recognition or enforcement. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
