Search for: "United States v. Cunningham"
Results 221 - 240
of 262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
1 May 2008, 7:43 am
Cunningham had assumed biological fathers have a right to custody and visitation even without having their parentage ajudicated in his Hinshaw v Hinshaw opinion when he talked about Mrs. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
Moore, No. 06-1082 In a case raising the issue of whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment by making an arrest based on probable cause but prohibited by state law, the Supreme Court rules that warrantless arrests for crimes committed in the presence of an arresting officer are reasonable under the Constitution, and that while states are free to regulate such arrests however they desire, state restrictions do not alter the Fourth Amendment's protections. … [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:41 pm
United States, 546 U.S. 12 (2005) makes this rule non-jurisdictional. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 8:48 pm
Cunningham, 337 Or. 528, 99 P.3d 271 (Or. 2004), and the very recent State v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:53 pm
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Appellant contends that (1) there is insufficient evidence to support his convictions of second degree murder, hit-and-run and gross vehicular manslaughter, (2) the trial court gave erroneous causation instructions to the jury, thereby depriving him of due process and a fair trial, and (3) the upper term sentence on his felony hit-and-run conviction violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution as set forth in Cunningham v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 5:32 pm
Frawley (available here), begins this way:This case is before us for a second time, after remand from the United States Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of its recent opinion in Cunningham v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Bagley, No. 04-4289Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over a meritless claim that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:48 pm
Of course, because of my sentencing-addled brain, I view Cunningham v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 3:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:08 am
KPMG Defendants Seek Postponement of Trial
New York Law Journal
Following the dismissal of charges against 13 of the 18 ex-KPMG employees in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
United States of America (The Bahamas) [2007] UKPC 52 (23 July 2007) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:16 am
Wachovia, and Cunningham v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We've already deplored the recent decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court rejecting the learned intermediary rule outright, State ex rel. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
United States, 740 F.2d 1428, 1440 (8th Cir. 1984); Madsen v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
., United States v. [read post]
