Search for: "United States v. Detente"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2019, 2:39 pm
A substantial number of unauthorized immigrants sought asylum in the United States, claiming as a defense to removal under the U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 9:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 12:05 pm
In this respect, the Court recalls its case-law to the effect that a Contracting State is considered to retain Convention liability in respect of treaty commitments and other agreements between States subsequent to the entry into force of the Convention (see, for example, Al-Saadoon and Mufdhi v. the United Kingdom, no. 61498/08, §§ 126-128, ECHR 2010-…). [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:00 am
Regina (Kambadzi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [On appeal from Regina (SK (Zimbabwe)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department] [2011] UKSC 23; [2011] WLR (D) 175 “In addition to complying with the statutory requirements for detaining a foreign national who was awaiting deportation from the United Kingdom, the Secretary of State was also required to comply with the published Home Office policy relating to the… [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
With respect to the applicability of the Constitution, Dixon cited Justice Anthony Kennedy’s concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 1:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
The ICE detention story reflects a long pattern in the United States of the coerced sterilization of marginalized populations, particularly of Black, Latinx, and Indigenous peoples. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:17 am
In 1982, in United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 4:00 am
Will a majority of the Virginia Supreme Court or United States Supreme Court find a way to say that no seizure took place in Middlebrooks? [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 3:43 am
They stem from the long-established principle of United Kingdom public law that statutory powers must be used for the purpose for which they were conferred and not for some other purpose: Padfield v Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food [1968] AC 997. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:41 am
Constitution, of subjecting a legally resident alien, captured in the United States, to long-term military detention as an “enemy combatant. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:07 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 3:03 am
Supreme Court, 2007) and United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:54 am
THE WHITE HOUSE Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release January 22, 2009EXECUTIVE ORDER- - - - - - -REVIEW OF DETENTION POLICY OPTIONSBy the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, in order to develop policies for the detention, trial, transfer, release, or other disposition of individuals captured or apprehended in… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:00 am
United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
The Supreme Court in Hamdi v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 12:20 pm
In 1975, the Supreme Court in O’Connor v Donaldson held that it was unconstitutional for a state to continue to confine a harmless, mentally ill person. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 3:03 pm
United States The majority holds that foreign nationals held at Guantanamo Bay have a right to pursue habeas challenges to their detention. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department; HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
