Search for: "United States v. Dutch"
Results 221 - 240
of 767
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2013, 7:51 am
United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 3:43 pm
In 2008, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York had made headlines in the same case when it decided to allow French, Dutch, and British investors to be included in the class. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:05 am
In South Africa v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 4:04 am
New York is full of real estate stories, and has been since Dutch times. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 2:54 pm
A lawsuit, however, was brought in the United States, relying on the Alien Tort Statute—part of a Judiciary Act from 1789. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am
“Unlike those cases,” the plaintiffs argue, “this case concerns violations by U.S. citizens from U.S. territory where no foreign state could complain about the United States holding its citizens accountable for such violations. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 9:59 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum and Jesner v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:11 am
Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:44 am
Judge Posner held in Apple v. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 10:05 am
See Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 3:31 pm
The Argentinians will almost certainly try to spoil the German flow, and Ghana and the United States have proven that the Germans can be held or hobbled. [read post]
Obama Administration Calls for Significant Restrictions on the Application of the Alien Tort Statute
18 Jun 2012, 7:01 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum arguing for significant limitations on the application of the Alien Tort Statute ("ATS") to conduct outside the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
Related posts:New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed In Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum, et al.,... [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 11:35 am
I will now take the opportunity to offer a very brief comparison between the Dutch case and the treatment of the attribution issue by the European Court of Human Rights in Al-Jedda v United Kingdom (GC). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 am
Indeed, that issue could not have been presented in Sosa, which involved conduct for which the United States could easily have been deemed responsible. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:41 am
Supreme Court To Hear Case Concerning The Scope and Applicability of The Forum Non Conveniens Doctrine Another ATS Case Seeking Supreme Court Review New Alien Tort Statute Case At The United States Supreme Court: Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Petition Filed [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 9:17 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 5:07 pm
On this basis the Court concluded that the Schauzu publication discloses olanzapine as one of its compounds.In its assessment, the Court took into account the EPO case law on flaws and mistakes in disclosures (T 89/87, T 412/91, T77/87, T 591/90).The Court also admitted that its decision deviated from earlier decisions in the United States, China, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, Germany, United Kingdom, Austria and Spain, giving a brief explanation… [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
Nonetheless, he has throughout had contact with a Dutch doctor who works with inmates at the Tribunal's Detention Unit. [read post]
