Search for: "United States v. FEDERAL COMPANY"
Results 221 - 240
of 12,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2023, 5:58 am
(United) violated federal law when it discriminated against a full-time telecommuter by refusing to grant her a religious exemption from the company's COVID-19 vaccine requirement, the U.S. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 8:13 am
If the clause selects the nation as a whole, however, it is better to select the courts “in” in the United States rather than courts “of” the United States to make clear that the suit may be brought in either state or federal court. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:02 pm
Footnotes (1) Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:50 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently announced its ruling in the Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
Schmitt, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:20 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Monday ruled in favor of drug companies in landmark case City of Huntington, West Virginia v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Proclaimed by the President of the United States on July 26, 1911. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 6:42 am
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois has granted the United States Soccer Federation and Major League Soccer summary judgment on antitrust claims that they conspired to drive promotion company ChampionsWorld out of business. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:33 am
Recently, a United States federal court took a step to hold some of these companies responsible, for being at least complicit in a system supported by slavery, as the court put it in “receiving cocoa at a price that would not be obtainable without employing child slave labor. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:14 am
” In United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
ARTICLE V. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:30 pm
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.comOn June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg in “United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 11:06 am
The United Supreme Court on Wednesday, in a 6-3 ruling, held that a drug company is not protected from state law claims simply because the federal government approved the product and its labeling. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:00 pm
United States (06-11429) on what qualifies as a “felony drug offense” for federal sentencing purposes, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
Insurance companies prefer to have cases in Federal Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 7:02 am
V. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:34 pm
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 7:49 am
(See Ryan v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
On August 31, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Stauffer v. [read post]
