Search for: "United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission" Results 221 - 240 of 318
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States 21-171Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 7:50 am by Matthew Scarola
The editorial board of the Los Angeles Times discusses a legislative response to United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm by John Elwood
” After Axon Enterprise acquired a competitor, it found itself subjected to antitrust review by the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am by Haley Proctor
Surface Transportation Bd., Norfolk Southern petitioned for review of an order by the Surface Transportation Board (successor to the Interstate Commerce Commission) concerning the Belt Line. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:12 am
(d) Guidelines by Attorney General Not later than one year after August 23, 1988, the Attorney General, after consultation with the Commission, the Secretary of Commerce, the United States Trade Representative, the Secretary of State, and the Secretary of the Treasury, and after obtaining the views of all interested persons through public notice and comment procedures, shall determine to what extent compliance with this section would be enhanced and… [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm by Christa Culver
Brown (1943); and (2) whether a binding agreement among multiple states, with both intra- and interstate effects, violates the Compact Clause, Article I, § 10, cl. 3 of the United States Constitution, in the absence of congressional approval.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (5th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition (forthcoming)Amicus brief of Freedom Holdings et al.Reply brief for the petitioners Title: Lay v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
United States — in which a splintered majority of the Supreme Court held that the CWA does not regulate all wetlands. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 11:01 pm by Jarod Bona
Toys “R” Us sold about twenty-percent of the toys in the United States and in some metropolitan areas, it sold up to almost half of the toys. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 7:34 am by Stephen Wermiel
On Wednesday, June 26, he shared his strong disagreement with the majority’s ruling striking down a portion of the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has held and the United States has repeatedly urged, contrary to the decision below. [read post]