Search for: "United States v. Means" Results 221 - 240 of 29,667
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
However, this does not necessarily mean that all of the commissioners agreed on every theory of harm asserted. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:44 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court of the United States is currently considering whether, and under what circumstances, such ordinances are constitutional. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Until 2016, different jurisdictions in the United States had different rules regarding art confiscated due to Nazi persecution. [read post]
6 May 2024, 7:38 am by Chukwuma Okoli
Miss Anam Abdul-Majid (LLM, University of Birmingham; LLB, University of Nairobi; BSC.IBA, United States International University; Advocate and Head of Corporate and Commercial Department, KSM Advocates, Nairobi, Kenya). [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:43 am by INFORRM
The second ground of appeal, on meaning and the inaccuracy of the data, failed, however the success of the abuse of process ground proved fatal to the claim. 5RB summarised the decision. [read post]
“Lawful under the circumstances in which it is provided” means that the reproductive health care is either: lawful under the circumstances in which the health care is provided and in the state in which it is provided; or protected, required, or authorized by Federal law, including the United States Constitution, regardless of the state in which such health care is provided. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to diminish or infringe upon any right protected under the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
2 May 2024, 8:08 am by Kalvis Golde
United States, Khadr asks the justices to grant review and reverse the D.C. [read post]
2 May 2024, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
It also provides representative examples of the mark as displayed on products in stores in the United States. [read post]
The Act makes it unlawful for data brokers to sell, license, rent, trade, transfer, release, disclose, provide access to, or otherwise make available personally identifiable sensitive data of a United States individual (i.e., people residing in the United States) to any foreign adversary or any entity controlled by a foreign adversary. [read post]