Search for: "United States v. Obey" Results 221 - 240 of 611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
People in the United States are flocking to cities and rubbing shoulders at greater rates than ever before. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:33 am by Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers
People in the United States are flocking to cities and rubbing shoulders at greater rates than ever before. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 10:43 pm by Mark Tushnet
(But maybe not.)Further, advocating for a constitutional convention can put on the table policy proposals that are quite utopian given existing constitutional arrangements -- most obviously, the equal representation of the states in the Senate, but probably also revision of our entire constitutional approach to campaign finance (not merely Citizens United, itself not an important decision and in my view well-supported by existing constitutional doctrine -- which is the real… [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 8:30 am
In an amicus filing in the case of Medellin v. [read post]
United States, wherein the university barred interracial dating due to their religious beliefs. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 8:13 am by Michael Grossman
It was in the highest appellate court in the land, the United States Supreme Court, that the final word was handed down. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm by Stephen Halbrook
Itself a prolific issuer of guidance documents, the United States filed an amicus curiae brief in support of neither party. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 6:24 pm by Jay Stanley
Accordingly, in 2010 the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals decided in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 7:40 pm
Party Constitution CPPCC Constitution State Constitution 1945 Amendment VI 1949 Common Program 1954 Amendment I Constitution Promulgated 1956 Amendment VII 1969 Amendment VIII 1973 Amendment IX 1975 Amendment I 1977 Amendment X 1978 Amendment II Amendment II 1982 Amendment XI Amendment III Amendment III 1987 Amendment XII 1988 Amendment IV 1992 Amendment XIII 1993 Amendment V 1994 Amendment IV 1997 Amendment… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
” Once properly adjudicated to be unconstitutional, a statute is no longer the positive law of the United States and citizens need not obey it. [read post]