Search for: "United States v. Obey"
Results 221 - 240
of 611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm
” That process unfolds as follows: the Attorney General may (and reliably does) oppose the request for disclosure by filing an affidavit stating that the disclosure “would harm the national security of the United States,” per 50 U.S.C. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:45 pm
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
Will the United States survive the 2016 election (and 2017 Inauguration of Donald Trump)? Continuing
22 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Tomorrow I shall teach Prigg v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 12:00 pm
See, Clark v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
Now that he has been sworn in as the 45th President of the United States, Donald Trump is entitled to a four-year lease on the White House. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:24 pm
In City of Boerne v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:45 pm
Again, it is a new doctrine of constitutional law that one indicted for disobedience to an unconstitutional statute may not defend on the ground of the invalidity of the statute, but must obey it though he knows it is no law, and, after he has suffered the disgrace of conviction and lost his liberty by sentence, then, and not before, seek, from within prison walls, to test the validity of the law. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 3:06 pm
” In 2013, President Barack Obama nominated Pryor to serve on the United States Sentencing Commission and he currently serves as Acting Chair. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
United States, the purpose of the anti-commandeering doctrine is the “[p]reservation of the States as independent and autonomous political entities. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 12:42 pm
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
Plenty of trial and appellate judges likely do not take kindly to the United States Supreme Court decisions in Missouri v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 7:41 am
Indeed, the United States explained that “A statute enforceable through an unassessed monetary penalty creates an obligation to obey the law, not an obligation to pay money. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Clark, 420 Mass. 699, 700 (1995), quoting from United Factory Outlet, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:02 am
In Guevara v Soto, 2016 WL 4921546 (E.D. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 11:32 pm
Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, No. 15-9504, 2016 WL 3909526 (10th Cir. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 5:52 am
Harwell v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
