Search for: "United States v. Pointer"
Results 221 - 240
of 247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
Media reports indicate that this Ordinance was drafted during the previous regime under the United Progressive Alliance. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:07 am
From Gannett Media Corp. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Many of the silicone cases were pending in a multi-district litigation, MDL 926, before Judge Sam Pointer, in the Northern District of Alabama. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit—whose decisions bind Colorado's school districts—has likewise made clear that any forecast of substantial disruption must rest on a "concrete threat" of substantial disruption. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
[So much for an ordinary day in an august courthouse.]United States v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 10:12 am
From Judge Barbara Rothstein's opinion yesterday in Kennedy v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 2:21 pm
Gotcher is an Investigator with the United States Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) in the Dallas Regional Office. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 10:41 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 [D.C. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Duggar v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
In a (not entirely successful) attempt to keep the litigation of this contentious case under control, Judge Peck, from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, bifurcated the trial—limiting the first phase to the questions of whether Iridium was insolvent or had unreasonably small capital. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 4:27 pm
Southwest v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 12:27 pm
Policy, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 8:02 am
File this one right next to “Brown v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
The rest of the PD sets out some useful pointers for what factors the court might consider in thinking about whether there is ‘good reason’ to do something different, and it gives some illustrative examples of what that something else might be (for example exclusion of the media for some or all of a hearing). [read post]
