Search for: "United States v. Ponder"
Results 221 - 240
of 376
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2013, 6:04 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, 12-1269; and Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:14 am
The question is whether the United States is politically and militarily prepared to dig in for a 10- or 20-year campaign. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:28 am
Rumsfeld, Hamdan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
" United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:00 am
However, the Archivist of the United States certified the amendment as ratified under Article V of the Constitution, and published it in the federal register. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:12 am
The style of the case is Emma Gonzales v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
We’ve been pondering what to do with the latest 70+ page whopper from the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas for a couple of weeks. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 5:56 am
More recently he appeared in Bowman v United Kingdom [1998] 26 EHRR 1, in which the European Court of Human Rights declared an electoral law inhibiting campaigns by Catholic pressure groups to be incompatible with the article 10 right to freedom of expression. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 8:03 am
While Europe imposed eligibility restrictions, the United States embraced strong patent protection. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 1:48 pm
On Monday, October 7, Matt Ponder arrived at 4:00 a.m. to secure spot 51 in the line for that morning’s cases, Kahler v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 11:21 am
The Journal describes how secret negotiations between Iran and the United States, dating back to 2009 and facilitated by Oman, have made possible a potential nuclear deal. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am
Ben also contrasted Donald Trump’s latest proposal to bar Muslims from entering the United States with Mai El-Sadany’s piece on being an American Muslim these days. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 11:58 am
In the case of United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 9:20 am
The Court accepted that, in any kind of suit, §337(a) restricts the ability of a plaintiff to pursue a theory that turns on claimed FDCA violations:Section 337(a) of the FDCA bars private enforcement of the statute, stating that “all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this [Act] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
Ltd v Ankenævnet for Patenter og Varemærker, a reference from Højesteret (Denmark), has been considered, pondered over and duly ruled upon by the CJEU in two days short of a year. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 10:41 am
United States. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
” Pace William Riker—who (in)famously argued that, “if in the United States one disapproves of racism, one should disapprove of federalism”—LaCroix reveals how state power was wielded in service of abolition and Black freedom. [read post]
