Search for: "United States v. Price"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,792
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
United States (1962) as conclusory evidence. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
And in the United States, the statistics are that Apple has well over half of the smartphones. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 1:58 am
Leonid V. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Despite significant federal investment in reducing emissions across most sectors, regulators and policymakers in the United States continue to exempt agricultural enterprises from much compulsory oversight. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision in Biden v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 12:52 pm
United States, 599 U.S. ____ (2023), the U.S. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 8:03 am
United States, but similar to the last post, I am not going to review that decision in detail. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 8:30 am
Next term the Supreme Court will hear argument in CFPB v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 5:47 am
Luo traveled to the United States at Mr. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Lawyers for MGN told the court the company has “paid a very heavy price” for the hacking scandal, while advocates for Prince Harry argued he was entitled to £320,000 in aggravated damages. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:56 pm
SuperValu Inc. et al., case number 21-1326, all before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:39 pm
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:41 am
Microsoft & Activision Blizzard was lively, and that is primarily so because Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California had interesting and challenging questions for both parties--plus a great sense of humor. [read post]
