Search for: "United States v. Rivera"
Results 221 - 240
of 357
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6357, Rivera v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
FULLER, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 6:54 pm
In cases in which a party asserts they are protected from liability via governmental immunity, the courts will weigh several factors to determine whether the assertion is true, as illustrated in Rivera v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:27 am
OATH found that Bey and his co-plaintiffs were guilty of all charges filed against them except their alleged "disclaiming of their United States citizenship. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:45 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice Transmitting Conviction Supported Even If Firm Not 'Domestic Financial Institution' United States v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 8:05 am
LEXIS 49270, March 10, 2011) and dismissed a prisoner's claim that he was required, in violation of the Establishment Clause, to attend a faith-based AA and NA program as a condition of parole.In Rivera v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 2:42 pm
See Rivera v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:10 pm
" The case is Hispanics United of Buffalo v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:31 pm
United States, which teaches us that bankruptcy law uses state law inputs regarding property rights. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
Moreover, applying the Supreme Court’s 1995 opinion in Wyoming v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 5:30 am
United States, 94 US 97 (1876) (“fugitive disentitlement doctrine”). [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Carmen Márquez and Ilianys Rivera. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:21 pm
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorneys Carmen Márquez and Ilianys Rivera. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:05 pm
Sánchez Valle, 2015 T.S.P.R. 25, y la opinión concurrente del juez Juan Torruella en United States v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:07 pm
Food-related illness in the United States. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:39 am
United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488, 83 S. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:53 am
Justice Smith filed a separate concurring opinion, while Justice Rivera dissented (Santer v Board of Education of East Meadow Union Free School District, May 6, 2014, Abdus-Salaam, S). [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 8:31 pm
This is one of the grounds that property managers have historically used to justify filling out housing forms, and the Divisional Court recently upheld this practice in Rivera v. [read post]
