Search for: "United States v. Roman" Results 221 - 240 of 565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Inc., Thomas Fletcher & Company, Inc., Sergei Voronchenko, Roman Thaker, Alex Berg, John Donadio and Padraig McGlynnCase number: 02-cv-9355 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: November 22, 2002Qualifying Judgment/Order: June 19, 2014 07/24/2014 10/22/2014 2014-76 SEC v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:38 am by brown
Such laws would be unconstitutional and a direct challenge to Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
” In United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 2:14 pm by Francisco Macías
“As Holy Roman Emperor (r. 1519-56), Charles V ruled a vast European realm and New World empire. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
25 May 2007, 1:03 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Disappearance, Failure to Advise Court of Address Lead to Action's Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute United States ex rel Roundtree v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Medicare Fraud: CLINIC OWNERS GET PRISON FOR STEALING MEDICARE FUNDS, United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Pereira before him, had lived in the United States for less than 10 years when he was served with an NTA. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  The diverging approaches of the majority and the dissenters in United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
In response to this conundrum, American courts have oscillated between two judicial postures that the United States Supreme Court has found to be constitutionally permissible: (1) the “compulsory deference” method preferred in the 1871 case Watson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:14 am by Sierra N. Hennessy
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 6:18 pm
With representatives from the United States, United Kingdom, Finland, Australia, Germany, India and many more countries, it truly lived up to both its name and its stated goal. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 5:37 pm
Demonstrate familiarity with the legal regulation of CSR in the United States and selected other states, with a focus on the law of charitable giving and the emerging disclosure and reporting laws4. [read post]