Search for: "United States v. State Engineer"
Results 221 - 240
of 3,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2017, 6:15 pm
Facts: This case (Pertile et al v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 4:20 pm
United States Ex Rel. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:59 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 52 Friends of the Headwaters MSJ 53-1 Tribes and Tribal Orgs MSJ 61-1 US Cross Motion 64 Enbridge Cross Motion 65 Tribal Reply 67 Friends Reply 69 US Reply 70 Enbridge Reply 90 DCT Order Prior post here. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:00 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers: 2017 03 15 Em Mtn for Injunction 2017 03 17 ACOE Resp in Opp 2017 03 17 CRST Reply 2017 03 17 DAPL Resp in Opp Exhibits 2017 03 17 DAPL Resp in Opp 2017 03 18 Order Denying Injunction [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 6:54 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (D.D.C.): 546 DCT Order Related briefs: 507 US Brief 510 Dakota Access Brief 527 Tribal Plaintiffs Brief 531 Congressional Amicus Brief 532 Environmental Amicus Brief 533 Tribal Amicus Brief 536 US Reply 539 Dakota Access Reply Prior post here. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 12:55 pm
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 3:19 pm
United States [transcripts, PDF]. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:15 pm
This is a clean and decisive ruling, but it’s not the first time that a court has used Section 230 to reject an RTBF-style claim in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 12:57 am
You can find the two court filings below.United States et al. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 8:46 am
Army Corps of Engineers, 531 U.S. 159 (2001); United States v. [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:00 am
The Court also released its opinion in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
United States Army Corps of Engineers (N.D. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm
v. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm
Army Corps of Engineers (“SWANCC”). [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 12:52 pm
TrademarkUse of the Term/Mark “Engineer”State Regulation of the TermFirst Amendment’s Commercial SpeechDisclaimerAppeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.E. raises only its constitutional claim on appeal. [read post]
21 Feb 2015, 8:28 am
Bockes v. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 8:01 pm
United States and Carabell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
Hawkes[i] involves a jurisdictional determination from the United States Corps of Engineers (the Corps) that found that a landowner’s wetlands comprises “waters of the United States” subject to Clean Water Act jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Case date: 19 February 2019 Case number: No. 18-60144 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]