Search for: "United States v. U.S. District Court for Eastern District of Michigan" Results 221 - 240 of 283
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan recently addressed this issue in U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm by Mike
 SICM argues that the Eastern District of Michigan is the appropriate form and seeks to transfer the action or dismiss it outright. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:52 pm
United States District Court for Eastern District of Michigan, 407 U.S. 297, 317 (1972); accord, Coolidge, 403 U.S. at 449 (“When the right of privacy must reasonably yield to the right of search is, as a rule, to be decided by a judicial officer, not by a policeman or Government enforcement agent. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:15 pm
Ct. 1727 (April 30, 2007), the United States Supreme Court has completely changed the patent landscape. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 9:27 am by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Southern Division) last week by Apotex Inc., the company is trying to trigger 180-day exclusivity for generic LEXAPRO Tablets. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:15 pm
Much of the discussion is centering on the impact of the 2005 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
District Court for the Central District of California, who ruled that Eastman had “more likely than not” conspired illegally with Trump to obstruct Congress. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in  HOURANEY,  -against- BURTON & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and BERNARD BURTON,08-CV-2688 (CBA)(LB);   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2011 U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
United States Issue: Whether a district court may direct a defendant to serve a federal sentence consecutively to a not-yet-imposed state sentence. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:11 pm
United States,1 a recent case decided in the district court of our very own Eastern District of Michigan, raises this issue. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:29 am by Gary Nitzkin
We have an interesting opinion out of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in the case of Mabbitt v Midwestern Audit Services, Judge Nancy Edmunds decided that a letter from a collection agency that merely informed a debtor that his old utilities balance would be added onto his new account was a communication not made in connection with the collection of a debt. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm by Gary Nitzkin
We have an interesting opinion out of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in the case of Mabbitt v Midwestern Audit Services, Judge Nancy Edmunds decided that a letter from a collection agency that merely informed a debtor that his old utilities balance would be added onto his new account was a communication not made in connection with the collection of a debt. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 4:29 pm by Gary Nitzkin
We have an interesting opinion out of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in the case of Mabbitt v Midwestern Audit Services, Judge Nancy Edmunds decided that a letter from a collection agency that merely informed a debtor that his old utilities balance would be added onto his new account was a communication not made in connection with the collection of a debt. [read post]