Search for: "United States v. Various Articles of Device"
Results 221 - 240
of 494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
The New Decision – Abu Gosh v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
On Nov. 17, 2017, the military commission in United States v. al-Nashiri reconvened for the purpose of receiving testimony from Professor Ellen Yaroshefsky, an ethics advisor to defendant’s learned counsel Richard Kammen, who had previously resigned over undisclosed ethics concerns. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Article 15, in contrast, is mentioned in passing but not discussed. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Article 15, in contrast, is mentioned in passing but not discussed. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
[v] The Manual would serve as an excellent policy model for state prosecutors to adopt. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:52 am
Unquestionably, the First Amendment protects Google’s display of search results within the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
Articles cited herein without stated authors are those of the author of this article—Ken Chasse.) [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 7:45 am
Circuit handed down an important computer search case Friday, United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 6:39 am
While the Guidelines are no longer mandatory and federal judges have far more sentencing discretion since the United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:46 am
United Kingdom From the recent British case in Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft v Technosport London Limited it appears that the vigorous enforcement of BMW trade mark rights is a trend that can also be found in other countries. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 10:51 am
5 years ago, in U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 8:39 am
The Ninth Circuit recently held in United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGP).[6] The problems of conforming to evolving norms becomes more difficult where states project their authority through commercial enterprises, that is where the societal (and economic) governance order of the enterprise is conflated with the political and legal order of the state.[7] SOEs have undergone tremendous change in both operation and framework ideology since 1945.[8] The contemporary faces of state owned… [read post]
31 May 2017, 9:01 pm
In deciding that the initiative device was a permissible way for a state to adopt congressional time, place and manner regulations under Article I of the Constitution, the Court adopted reasoning that makes clear that the initiative device is a similarly permissible way for states to undertake presidential election regulations under Article II as well. [read post]
30 May 2017, 9:53 am
The Supreme Court's broad and inclusive approach to exhaustion simply doesn't allow any kind of end-run around the exhaustion doctrine through a first sale outside the United States as in one of the two issues relevant in the Lexmark case. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 12:56 am
With respect to design patent damages in Apple v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 7:22 am
United States, 529 U.S. 334, 338 (2000)).Montgomery v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 3:01 pm
Vermillion and the City appeal, arguing that the superior court erred because article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution and the First and Fourth Amendments to the United States Constitution protect the requested documents.West v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:37 pm
The device’s use allowed Volkswagen to market its diesel vehicles to environmentally conscious consumers, increasing its sale of diesel cars in the United States and abroad and, as a result, its profitability. [read post]
