Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 221 - 240 of 8,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2008, 5:55 am
Today's Washington Post includes an editorial headlined "Military Justice," with this subhead: "Why did it take a near-tragedy for the Army to do the right thing in the Whiteside case? [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 6:06 am by Stephanie Sundier
The state Supreme Court maintains that “discrimination is not privileged or excused by the United States Constitution or the Washington Constitution. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:44 am by Mashel Law, L.L.C.
Trump’s judicial nominee to fill the open seat on the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is District of Colombia Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Brett Kavanaugh. [read post]
11 Feb 2017, 10:40 am by Jason Mazzone
The bulk of commentary from legal academics on President Trump's Executive Order concerning admission of non-citizens into the United States has involved creative advocacy rather than useful analysis. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:59 pm
As reported in a number of earlier posts (here, here, and here), the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in the consolidated cases of Davenport v. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
” In my view, the Washington State law is a frontal attack on free exercise and would be struck down if enacted. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:50 pm by Quanah Spencer
The price tag for the 2010 election cycle in Washington State just went up and it will likely be influenced by out-of-state donors as the share of in-state donors reaches contribution limits. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
However, when the trial court’s ruling involves libelous speech, the United States Supreme Court has indicated that independent appellate review is proper. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 11:18 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (case page at this link) Washington v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 7:16 am by Matthew Landis
Last week, I had the honor and privilege of being admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
  The Act was introduced in response to the United States Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. [read post]