Search for: "United Transit Company v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 728
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am
This past week we’ve seen the difficulties associated with using private companies and making these companies accountable come into sharp relief in the United States with the latest installation in the case of Mohammed et al v Jeppesen Dataplan. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 4:10 am
Div., First Department, the issue was whether it was arbitrary and capricious for NYPD to determine that service by former Transit Authority [TAPD] police officer Nicholas G. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:05 pm
Artist now suing the state. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 12:46 pm
The item isn’t approved by the FDA, so the company most likely thought this method was a clever way to advertise the product without having to present any sort of actual evidence as to its claims. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
Say you’re at a company that has valuable trade secrets. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 9:05 pm
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm
In the United States, violence is committed against Indigenous women at disproportionately high rates. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:18 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck shared the National Security Law Podcast, covering the Abu Khatallah verdict, the presidential transition team emails, Section 702 and ACLU v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
House of Representativesin response to the United States International Trade Commission's mid-December notice relating to the ITC's investigation of Qualcomm's first complaint against Apple (with Qualcomm seeking an import ban, which is the ITC's sole remedy).The United States Senators and United States Representatives who filed those letters, which support Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am
§ 214.1(e) clearly prohibits unauthorized unemployment, providing that: A nonimmigrant in the United States in a class defined in section 101(a)(15)(B) of the Act as a temporary visitor for pleasure, or section 101(a)(15)(C) of the Act as an alien in transit through this country, may not engage in any employment. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 11:33 am
'" It said "the literal interpretation of the concept of public use which the petitioners urge us to apply was abandoned long before the United States Supreme Court concluded [in Kelo v City of New London (545 US 469 [2005])] that the use of eminent domain to carry out an economic development plan does not violate the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Let me share just one more observation for now: Apple tries hard to distinguish its case from HTC v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 6:52 am
Several groups, including coal companies and a coalition of states led by West Virginia, appealed to the Supreme Court (see Court hears arguments on EPA’s authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions, February 28, 2022).Article III standing. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 11:16 am
The attendance of witnesses and the production of documentary evidence may be required from any place in the United States, or any territory, possession, or commonwealth of the United States, at any designated place of hearing [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 12:02 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:26 am
[i] Data Protection Commission v. [read post]
26 Oct 2013, 8:08 am
See, e.g., Larry Catá Backer, Emasculated Men, Effeminate Law in the United States, Zimbabwe and Malaysia. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:35 am
Commissioner (1989) and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 1:41 pm
| The IPKat congratulates two new IP silks | A Creative Commons-Licensed Work Walks into a Copy Shop - Great Minds v. [read post]
