Search for: "United v. Riverside"
Results 221 - 240
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2010, 7:06 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:55 pm
In Miccosukee Tribe v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
The $27.6 million settlement was reached after an investigation, launched in 2005, revealed that Walmart was dumping things like pesticide and paint in their trash and violating environmental laws and regulations, according to Michael Jeandron of the Riverside County District Attorney’s office. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 4:17 am
V. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:00 pm
United States, — U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 1:48 pm
The reinstatement of the proposed rule is in response to Tuscon Herpetological Society v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 2:58 pm
Mahone v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:49 am
Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 5:15 am
Another noteworthy decision was Animal Welfare Institute v. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
The emergency exception contains three elements, as follows: Police must have reasonable grounds to believe that there is an emergency at hand and an immediate need for their assistance for the protection of life or property The search must not be primarily motivated by intent to arrest and seize evidence There must be some reasonable basis, approximating probable cause, to associate the emergency with the area or place to be searched United States v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:50 am
United States, 441 U.S. 238, 99 S.Ct 1682, 60 L. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
TMI Sued Rosen Entertainment For Patent Infringement Over Headrest Mounted Video Screens/DVD Players
27 Jul 2009, 2:21 am
The case is TMI Products, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
Inland Empire Energy Center, LLC (9th Cir.Cal., Nov. 18, 2008, No. 06-56632) U.S.App. 23854, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit examined when the citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”) may be used to halt construction of a power plant that was granted an integrated permit.The Inland Empire Energy Center (“IEEC”), intended to construct a power plant in Romoland, an unincorporated area of Riverside County. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 6:16 am
The trial of Mattel, Inc. v MGA Entertainment, Inc. began on May 27, 2008, in United States Court of the Central District of California in Riverside, Calif., and was presided by the Honorable Stephen G. [read post]
