Search for: "Unknown Defendants A, B & C"
Results 221 - 240
of 486
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
Under Section 1102 (b), the manner and circumstances of inspection are subject to “reasonable standards as may be set forth in, or pursuant to, the operating agreement. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
Under Section 1102 (b), the manner and circumstances of inspection are subject to “reasonable standards as may be set forth in, or pursuant to, the operating agreement. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 3:31 am
Under Section 1102 (b), the manner and circumstances of inspection are subject to “reasonable standards as may be set forth in, or pursuant to, the operating agreement. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Under (a), (b) and (c) the analysis was correctly determined as to whether a payment can be made to or for the settlor. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:14 pm
Under (a), (b) and (c) the analysis was correctly determined as to whether a payment can be made to or for the settlor. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:38 pm
It is yet unknown whether the Scottish Government will introduce new legal aid regulations to deal with the issues raised in the present case. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
A federal prosecutor would need to prove that a dealer actually knew an object was stolen, but a state prosecutor may simply need to prove that a dealer had reason to believe that an artifact had been stolen, which is a much lower legal burden.More importantly, almost one quarter of the states have a built-in legal assumption that a dealer in goods is presumed to know an object was stolen when (a) the dealer did not reasonably gather information about whether the good was lawfully… [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 12:20 pm
An engraving of some unknown person’s name. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:53 am
A person is not required to retreat before using deadly force as provided in subsection 1 if the person: (a) Is not the original aggressor; (b) Has a right to be present at the location where deadly force is used; and (c) Is not actively engaged in conduct in furtherance of criminal activity at the time deadly force is used. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Border Agent shoots a Mexican national across the border, and whether qualified immunity can shield an officer based on facts unknown to him at the time of the incident. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 3:35 am
Heller as “activist” and when he defended the Chief Justice’s decision in NFIB v. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Fisher 15-10Issue: Whether a capital defendant's decision not to introduce an inadequate mitigation defense at sentencing automatically defeats a claim that counsel's failure to prepare that defense deprived the defendant of his right to effective assistance of counsel. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:40 pm
After years of negotiation, the parties settled: the insurer agreed to pay more than $4 million and Witasick agreed to release known, unknown, and future claims. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:05 am
Newman, 773 F.3d 438 (2d Cir. 2014), a landmark decision that dismissed indictments against two insider trading defendants. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:24 am
Identify compromised computers, servers, specific data, and user accounts; b. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 2:12 pm
As Wikipedia explains, when a plaintiff (the person who files a civil suit) initiates a lawsuit, the defendant, the person who is being sued, can file a motion to dismiss the suit under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failing to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 7:01 am
Defendant used excerpts of the work in a documentary broadcast on Spanish television without Liffers' consent. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am
Copyright and real estate are different b/c of building and borrowing as key feature of creativity. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 5:03 pm
(b) The Claimant unscrupulously inflates costs. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 4:32 pm
The recent securities class actions that have gone to trial have primarily involved disputes as to whether risks were adequately disclosed.[20] In recent cases lost by the defense, sophisticated and presumably well-advised defendants believed that the allegedly “unknown” risks were in fact quite well known to the market. [read post]
