Search for: "Unknown Persons and Interested Parties" Results 221 - 240 of 1,789
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Thus, the most likely accommodation is conducting remote mediation, where the parties are not required to attend in person. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:44 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Thomas again pointed out that previous cases had said that next of kin are the real parties in interest, and they are statutorily prohibited from representing their own interest. [read post]
15 May 2023, 7:09 am by George Croner
Nonetheless, Congress recognizes that “it is simply not possible to collect intelligence on the communications of a party of interest without also collecting information about the people with whom, and about whom, that party communicates, including in some cases, non-targeted U.S. persons. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
In most instances, the conviction remains on a person’s record. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Combine extremely wealthy claimant, the subject matter of his sex life, a freely entered into confidentiality agreement, the absence of a genuine public interest, a blackmail threat and Adam Speker, the barrister who is fast-becoming the doyen of urgent applications involving some, or all, of these issues (think NPV v QEL & ZED [2018] EWHC 703 (QB) (see our blog here), PML v Persons Unknown [2018] EWHC 838 (QB) or Clarkson Plc v… [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 12:00 am
It's interesting to note a number of these are already bundled in Vista, at least to some extent. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:22 pm by Neil Wilkof
This case is interesting in that notwithstanding a pre-existing relationship between the parties, it was found that bad faith was not established.History between the partiesThe parties are familiar with each other, owing to a long history of disputes over their respective "Digi" marks, spanning 17 years. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 7:43 am
I read an interesting article in the New York Times that I want to share with my readers. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
TYU applied as a non-party for her name to be anonymised in the judgment and redaction of other personal information, but not reporting restrictions. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 2:42 pm by Jennifer Lynch
In the Seymour opinion, the four-justice majority recognized that people have a constitutionally protected privacy interest in their internet search queries and that these queries impact a person’s free speech rights. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 2:25 pm by Joe Mullin
“Opposition to public access to CRS report is rooted in fears of the unknown,” Schuman wrote. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
  The mother submitted an affidavit from a process server, accompanied by an affidavit of translation, attesting that the process server recognized the father personally, and on the process server’s third attempt, delivered the custody petition, motion for special findings, and notice of next court date to the father in Honduras. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:22 am by Charles Sartain
The citation was directed to “THE UNKNOWN OWNERS OF A 0.03125 ROYALTY INTEREST IN MABEE ‘B’ LEASE NO. 37676. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 6:04 am by Russell Knight
The notice shall state the time and place for taking the deposition; the name and address of each person to be examined, if known, or, if unknown, information sufficient to identify the deponent. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:47 am by Texas Legal News
The injured parties were rendered aid at the site of the crash and transported to area hospitals for further treatment. [read post]
While the business judgment rule allows for “judicial deference to business decisions[,]” this rule does not apply where the conduct advances the director’s or officer’s own self-interest or the interests of any party other than the corporation.. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 9:25 am by Evan Brown
The court came to this conclusion even though the record demonstrated that some unknown person, other than plaintiff, first registered the disputed domain name, and that defendant first acquired the domain name on the market many years after the TRX mark had become distinctive. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:56 pm by Russell Knight
If you don’t get that info, you can subpoena that person for more information. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 6:58 am by Liisa Speaker
A foster care specialist with DHHS was the only witness, and she testified that she had not tried to contact the respondent because her whereabouts were unknown. [read post]