Search for: "VERMONT v. NEW YORK" Results 221 - 240 of 755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Dan Carvajal
New York also has the highest state cigarette tax ($4.35 per pack), not counting the additional local New York City cigarette tax ($1.50 per pack). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:03 am by Jeffrey Risman
In recent years, court rulings and public opinion have been trending toward a broader interpretation of sex discrimination to include discriminatory acts based on gender identity and sexual orientation.Vermont, Connecticut, and New York Join Major Corporations to Support Equal Employment Opportunities for LGBT Workers In a sweeping gesture of support for LGBT rights in the U.S., the leading legal authorities of New York, Vermont, and Connecticut have… [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:03 am by Jeffrey Risman
In recent years, court rulings and public opinion have been trending toward a broader interpretation of sex discrimination to include discriminatory acts based on gender identity and sexual orientation.Vermont, Connecticut, and New York Join Major Corporations to Support Equal Employment Opportunities for LGBT Workers In a sweeping gesture of support for LGBT rights in the U.S., the leading legal authorities of New York, Vermont, and Connecticut have… [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 6:24 am by admin
We were still focused on the Court of Appeals in New York and I had taken over doing the HTML preparation of the Opinions as they came down and then we would make a selection. [read post]
By arguing that Title VII permits employers to discriminate against employees because they love or enter sexual relationships with people of the same sex, the Department of Justice broke with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the attorneys general of Connecticut, New York, and Vermont, and dozens of major corporations.As we argue, here, the DOJ’s position in Zarda is not only morally repugnant but also analytically weak. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:17 pm by Amy J. Traub and Saima Sheikh
Impact of This Decision As a result of this decision, it is now easier for employees within the Second Circuit (specifically, in New York, Connecticut and Vermont) to prevail on claims alleging FMLA violations by their employers if they can demonstrate that their exercise of their FMLA rights was only one reason why their employers took the adverse employment actions against them. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:17 pm by Amy J. Traub and Saima Sheikh
Impact of This Decision As a result of this decision, it is now easier for employees within the Second Circuit (specifically, in New York, Connecticut and Vermont) to prevail on claims alleging FMLA violations by their employers if they can demonstrate that their exercise of their FMLA rights was only one reason why their employers took the adverse employment actions against them. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am by Matthew Pinsker
How Aaron Burr changed the Constitution [1] One of the best online introductions to the history behind the Loving case comes from its entry in the Encyclopedia of Virginia, http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Loving_v_Virginia_1967 [2] According to a 2013 online exhibit from the Library of Virginia, there are ten states that never had bans on interracial marriage:  Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Rhode… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
The two amicus briefs were filed by 17 attorneys general, including New York, Virginia, Maryland, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:34 am by Orin Kerr
There is no indication anyone believed that the Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, and North Carolina texts, by using the word “his” rather than “their,” narrowed the protections contained in the Pennsylvania and Vermont Constitutions. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:05 am by Salvatore Gangemi of Murtha Cullina LLP
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which covers Connecticut, New York and Vermont, upheld a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) finding that Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. [read post]