Search for: "Valeo S. A." Results 221 - 240 of 316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2011, 9:51 am by Sam Favate
Udall’s proposal has nine co-sponsors in the Senate. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm by Bob Bauer, guest-blogger
Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976), and tied tightly to the objective of limiting corruption and its appearance. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 3:03 am by Michael Kang, guest-blogger
Valeo and the most publicly debated case in years, was largely missed in this public debate. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 6:02 am by Nexsen Pruet
Valeo, the longest-ever Supreme Court decision at 76,639 words. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:49 pm by Rick Hasen
Valeo which will appear in the new “First Amendment Stories” book out soon from Foundation Press. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:42 pm by Joey Fishkin
Valeo in 1976.In Arizona Free Enterprise v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:18 am by Heather K. Gerken
Valeo's split-the-baby approach, which treats contributions and expenditures differently for First Amendment purposes. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:37 am by Staci Zaretsky
These contract attorneys are being billed out lower than Reema Bajaj’s alleged hourly rate:Large firms are billing $325 to $550 for an hour’s work this year by freshman associates, while smaller firms bill them as low as $100, according to research firm Valeo Partners. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:50 pm by Record on Appeal
Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976) “that expenditure limits represent substantial rather than merely theoretical restraints on the quality and diversity of political speech while contributions limits entail only a marginal restriction upon the contributor’s ability to engage in free communication. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:06 pm by Lyle Denniston
Valeo, between limits on campaign spending and limits on campaign contributions. [read post]
27 May 2011, 11:07 am by Eugene Volokh
Valeo also held), so there’s no “prevent the evasion of individual expenditure limits” justification. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Valeo also held), so there’s no “prevent the evasion of individual expenditure limits” justification. [read post]