Search for: "Vote v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 9,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2014, 9:28 pm by Richard M. Re
United States, which involved the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule and was resolved 7-2. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 4:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
United States (District Court docket 11-1303). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 11:19 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
In 1965, efforts to suppress the votes of minorities, particularly in the South, led the United States Congress to pass the historic Voting Rights Act (VRA), which has, for generations, been used to ensure that elections are free, fair, and accessible to all eligible voters. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Rory Little
United States – which was a product of the residual clause itself — has generated. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Christopher Mathews
  Once a proposed sentence receives at least a 2/3-rds vote, that becomes the sentence of the court. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Mary Beth Buchanan, who is an Ethics and Reputational Risk Officer at the United Nations and a  former United States Attorney. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am by The Federalist Society
 Justice Scalia filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor and Kagan.To discuss the case, we have Mary Beth Buchanan, who is an Ethics and Reputational Risk Officer at the United Nations and a  former United States Attorney. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 7:02 am by Robert Kreisman
In this year 2015, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (“VRA”) was heralded as “the most effective civil rights law in the history of the United States,” Richard L. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm by Lisa McElroy
It’s almost here . . . the Senate vote to confirm Elena Kagan as the 112th Justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 10:50 am by Keith Jones
The United States Supreme Court ruled today in Caperton v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm by David Kopel
Argument: The United States Constitution permits, in fact requires, presidential electors to exercise their best discretion and judgment when casting their votes for President and Vice-President. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 11:54 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
United States Supreme Court CIVIL OPINIONS Constitutional Law Free speech; ethics laws A state law requiring public officials to recuse themselves from voting on, or advocating the passage or failure of certain measures is not unconstitutionally overbroad. [read post]
On June 29, 2021, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, held that a natural gas company’s right to condemn property for a pipeline under the Natural Gas Act includes the right to condemn state-owned property. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 5:35 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
It is systematically dismantling voting rights protections that make it possible for every voter to have an equal voice, and for every political party to compete fairly for control of the United States government. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 3:12 pm by Rick.Hasen@lls.edu
Gore, in which the United States Supreme Court decided the fate of the presidency after a razor-thin vote difference between George W.... [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 8:38 am
United States - what qualifies as a "felony drug offense" for felony sentencing purposes United States v. [read post]