Search for: "WATER POWER v. Human Rights"
Results 221 - 240
of 617
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The orders make it illegal to draw or divert water from the Upper Russian River, except as needed to ensure human health and safety. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Judicial review and the humane treatment ofanimals. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
The court challenge, which was filed by the ACLU on behalf of organizations including Wikimedia, Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International USA, and The Nation, is one of the most significant surveillance challenges to have been filed since the Snowden disclosures. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 8:27 am
E.g., Lin v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
CALIFORNIA WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY 1. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Thailand (2017) provided for a national reform of water resource management to respond to climate change. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:49 pm
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 25. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:08 am
The court asserted that, in realization of this constitutional obligation, "it has all incidental and ancillary powers including the power to forge new remedies and fashion [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:33 am
This rights advocacy arc received its most prominent success in the landmark case of D.H. v Czech Republic where the European Court of Human Rights found structural educational exclusion of the local Roma population in the town of Ostrava. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm
Prior to Citizens United v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:15 am
Most human beings are prone to this error, including President Trump. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
Power Co. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 6:52 am
In response to outcry from the ACLU and human rights groups, President Obama releases the following statement: “We are in a time of national emergency. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 10:57 am
In response to outcry from the ACLU and human rights groups, President Obama releases the following statement: "We are in a time of national emergency. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 11:10 pm
For the latter reason, the applicants argue that the Order is not neutral and generally applicable for purposes of Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am
Because the agency would have no power related to climate change impacts, there was no discretionary action that triggered CEQA. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
News & Analysis 10555-10561 (2010).Three Degrees Conference on the Law of Climate Change and Human Rights. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 3:42 am
This judgment confirms that companies may be held accountable in negligence to third parties for environmental and human rights harms caused by their overseas subsidiaries. [read post]
