Search for: "WATKINS v. U.S."
Results 221 - 240
of 318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
” Watkins v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 6:27 am
Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 43 (1988); see also United States v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
(IP Whiteboard) Watkins – Ninth Circuit orders release of information on counterfeit seizures: Watkins v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:11 am
’” Id. at 571-72 (quoting Watkins v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:01 pm
”The case cite is Watkins v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 9:15 am
” (Watkins v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 2:23 am
Three recent cases decided by the U.S. [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:11 pm
In recognition of the changing governance environment, the Latham & Watkins law firm has published an interesting memo entitled “12 Steps to Truly Good Corporate Governance” (here). [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 4:12 am
Hernandez, 941 F.2d 133, 137-38 (2d Cir. 1991); Watkins v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 6:56 pm
The LA Times:The U.S. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 9:46 am
Supreme Court case about her grandfather: Watkins v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:57 am
The Court in Moriarty, citing Watkins v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:59 pm
Watkins, 11 F.3d 1573, 1578 (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
" Watkins asked during a recent interview. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:22 am
Violating constitutional rights or exceeding the scope of the authorizing resolution could result in a legally unenforceable investigation or set of questions, See Watkins v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 4:11 am
Watkins, 243 F. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 2:47 pm
Materiality is an objective standard, see U.S. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
Robert Elwyn Watkins v Philip James Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB) 5 November 2010- read judgment The Election Court has ruled that the Labour MP for Oldham knowingly and deliberately misled the constituency and as a result his election is void under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act (1983). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
Smith of Latham & Watkins LLP. [read post]