Search for: "WONDERS v. ARMY " Results 221 - 239 of 239
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2011, 2:56 pm by Nick Holmes
Lord Justice Toulson in R v Chambers [2008] EWCA Crim 2467 famously bemoaned the complexity of legislation: To a worryingly large extent, statutory law is not practically accessible today, even to the courts whose constitutional duty it is to interpret and enforce it. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 4:30 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Seeing so many familiar faces with whom I have grown up in the military and the law takes me back to a time when we were all much younger, and in fact to my own earliest days in the Army. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Some highly experienced law of war experts inside the military would eventually conclude (following the "gap" argument about GC3 and GC4) that they should be treated instead as spies and saboteurs under GC4, but no one so far as I know suggested that they would be POWs, and the White House lawyers did not have the background knowledge really to understand that (the role of David Addington in this debate is unknown to me, but I do wonder). [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm by David Kopel
No wonder Madison chose the word "bear" when he wrote the Second Amendment. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm by Rick
(I wonder how long it’s going to take Carnivore’s descendant to target me now.) [read post]
15 Aug 2009, 2:52 pm by Daniel Brown
Some also feel that the police are a kind of army of occupation who shouldn't get their co-operation.The slogan “stop snitching” gained cultural traction via hip-hop songs and a popular line of clothing that the mayor of Boston once tried to ban from stores. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
On July 2, 1976, in deciding the case of Gregg v Georgia, the Supreme Court legalised capital punishment after a decade-long moratorium on executions. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am by Joe Mullin
In this episode, you’ll learn about: The prior art, or evidence, of earlier technology that EFF was able to present to courts to prove that the so-called “podcasting patent” was invalid How the landmark Alice v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
They might have carried their weapons only to display them or to defend themselves if attacked by the armies of Antifa. [read post]