Search for: "WONDERS v. ARMY " Results 221 - 239 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
It makes me wonder whether the hot streaks were caused by some particular individual pushing for certifications with a cold streak following when that individual PCSed or retired. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
Charon wonders, via a text from a bar in West London, if Simon Heffer will be pleased at this development.] [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:01 am
Some highly experienced law of war experts inside the military would eventually conclude (following the "gap" argument about GC3 and GC4) that they should be treated instead as spies and saboteurs under GC4, but no one so far as I know suggested that they would be POWs, and the White House lawyers did not have the background knowledge really to understand that (the role of David Addington in this debate is unknown to me, but I do wonder). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
  To them, the majority ignored a bedrock principle of bankruptcy law, which Justice Alito most recently reiterated in Travelers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
On July 2, 1976, in deciding the case of Gregg v Georgia, the Supreme Court legalised capital punishment after a decade-long moratorium on executions. [read post]
18 May 2007, 6:55 pm
A two-judge majority of the panel holds that the evidence was properly admitted and specifically rejects the Army Court's holding in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 2:15 pm
Each of their opinions is wonderful -- and wonderfully respectful of the other. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
Final Report to the Secretary of the Army on the Nuernberg War Crimes Trials under Control Council Law No. 10 1 v. (1849) Taylor, Telford; Germany (Territory under Allied occupation, 1945-1955 - U.S. [read post]