Search for: "Waite v. United States"
Results 221 - 240
of 5,192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2023, 1:37 am
United States Bureau of Reclamation 22-1116Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 requires dismissal of an action challenging a federal agency’s use of water subject to state-adjudicated water rights if a Native American tribe asserts an interest in the suit and does not consent to joinder. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 1:24 am
First, FTC v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 9:14 am
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 10:16 am
For roughly 30% on both ends of the political spectrum, any inquiry into these charges will begin and end at the caption: “United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 11:29 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:54 pm
Mondor et al have filed a joint Petition for Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States (“SCOTUS”). [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 10:32 am
Romania and Al Nashiri v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 12:26 pm
Empire subsequently removed the action to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 11:43 am
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 11:45 am
The Court’s opinion in Sackett v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:20 pm
The Biden Administration is salivating at the prospect of United States v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 10:44 am
Oh, wait, now we remember! [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:48 am
United States, No. 23-443 makes clear. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am
In 1997’s United States v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
” The defendants ought to serve lengthy terms of incarceration because of their participation in a months-long conspiracy that aimed to oppose by force the authority of the United States. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 7:42 am
However, unlike some earlier claims, this is not a representative action, as the UK Supreme Court explicitly states at [8]. [read post]
