Search for: "Warner Brothers" Results 221 - 240 of 743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2013, 8:29 pm by Nerds in Court
” On appeal, Asylum argued that the Plaintiffs Warner Brothers Entertainment Inc., New Line Productions Inc., Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc., Saul Zentz Company, and New Line Cinema, LLC’s (the Studios) were unlikely to succeed on their trademark infringement claim regarding the term “Hobbit. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 9:36 am by Jonathan Bailey
However, according to Warner Brothers, the issue is not the use of copyrighted works in the classroom, which they openly acknowledge can be used, but instead was the advertising and marketing of the class, which Warner says used trademarked logos and images without permission. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Gerry W. Beyer
., late son of the actor who played the tin man in the Wizard of OZ, sued Warner Brothers (WB) just before their 75th anniversary. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:51 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Suit Filed Against Warner Bros. in Screenplay Theft First off today, Michael Cieply at The New York Times reports that Warner Brothers has been sued over the movie “Trouble With the Curve”, a 2012 baseball film starring Clint Eastwood. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 10:27 am by Jonathan Bailey
This week’s stories include: Fox Fails Again in Bid to Stop Dish’s Hopper Judge Leans in Favor of Aereo in Boston Lawsuit Google Book Search Case May Be Wrapping Up Warner Brothers May Be Held Accountable for False DMCA Notices Spain Passes New Anti-Piracy Legislation “Escape From Tomorrow” Escapes Legal Action Center for Copyright Information and Others Propose Copyright Curriculum for Elementary Schools You can download the MP3 file here (1:17:43, direct… [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 11:34 am by Jonathan Bailey
That being said, the Warner Brothers case above could adjust that even further, especially in cases where a DMCA filer behaves in a reckless manner. 4. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 10:56 am by Jonathan Bailey
Namely its claims that Warner Brothers misused a takedown tool to remove files it didn’t hold the copyright in. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 10:25 am by Milord A. Keshishian
Time Warner Ent., 462 F.3d 1072, 1081 (9th Cir. 2006) (holding that there was no protection for similar plots involving “the family-run funeral home, the father’s death, and the return of the ‘prodigal son,’ who assists his brother in maintaining the family business”). [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:09 am by Jonathan Bailey
Hasbro sued Sweetpea after it learned that it was working with Warner Brothers to create another Dungeons & Dragons film. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Jonathan Bailey
Hasbro, now wanting to work with Universal Studios on a new film, sued Sweatpea over it’s planned sequel with Warner Brothers. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
In 2011, Victor Whitmill, the tattoo artist responsible for the tattoo on the side of Mike Tyson’s face, brought a suit against Warner Brothers for using his tattoo design in the film The Hangover II without permission. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 10:45 am
South Bend, Indiana -- The Northern District of Indiana has ruled in favor of Warner Brothers Entertainment, Inc. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 10:59 am
Hudson, Holmes’ brother Mycroft, and his arch-nemesis Professor Moriarty. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 6:20 pm
The brothers never registered their agreement with Warner or ASCAP. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:00 pm by Legal Talk Network
Legally speaking, Warner Brothers’ design patent on the batmobile will run out, as will their patent on the story. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Hasbro, which own the rights to the popular roleplaying game, sued Sweetpea to block the studio from working with Warner Brothers to produce a sequel to its much-maligned first film, released in 2000. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:45 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Torrentfreak has a story with a new coinage about which I am skeptical, to the extent that it seeks to deprecate fair use, though I am glad to see Warner Brothers (sort of) acknowledge that fair use exists in practice: [David Kaplan, Chief of Anti-Piracy Operations at Warner Bros.] says that Warner Bros. and its parent company Time Warner are turning a blind eye to some forms of copyright infringement. [read post]