Search for: "Warren v. United States of America"
Results 221 - 240
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
And we all know that, as Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote in Schenk v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 1:28 pm
Two cases, United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 10:05 am
”When Brown v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:42 am
In May 1954, Brown v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 9:07 am
Graham v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
From Russ Bensing at The Briefcase comes the news that Ohio's 8th District Court of Appeals affirmed a suppression motion in State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Westwood, MA; Debra Nedder, President) Bay State Homes Real Estate Corporation (Woburn, MA; Karen Alderman, President) Bay State Rental Properties, Inc. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 9:07 pm
John Bogle AARP & Consumer Federation of America National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys North American Securities Administrators Association Professors Deborah DeMott and Mark Ascher Professors Robert Litan, Robert Mason, and Ian Ayres The United States Even by Supreme Court standards, this collection appears to be a large, impressive, and remarkable array of contending forces for a business law case. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Warren, MA; Michael Samek, President) 4 Coldfusion Foundation Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:46 am
Co. of America
U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
As you can guess from the title, Berger's book was very critical of the Warren court (and its aftermath in the 70s). [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 2:22 pm
The EAJA provided that a party prevailing against the United States could get attorney's fees unless the position of the United States was "substantially justified. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
Green & Joseph Oluwole, Hein v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP) Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP) Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark) Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46) Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
United States last year, for the first time we are approaching a time when empirical skills and knowledge are sufficiently available to lawyers themselves that the business of law outside the law schools is becoming strikingly more empirical. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
: Peer International Corporation, Southern Music Publishing Co and Peermusic (UK) Ltd v Editoria Musical de Cuba (IP finance) Justice Kitchin upholds British Beer and Pub Association and British Hospitality Association appeal against decision of Copyright Tribunal on basis for calculation of fees which members have to pay for background music (IPKat) Contempt of court: the risks of false testimony in trade mark infringement proceedings: KJM Superbikes Ltd v Hinton (IPKat) (IPKat)… [read post]
25 Oct 2008, 12:18 am
(Class 46) New Zealand Two for one in the House: Treaties and Anti-Counterfeiting Bill (International Law Office) South Africa 'Softlifting' adds to South African piracy woes (Afro-IP) Spain 'Theory of consumer error' rejected in criminal trade mark proceedings in Spain (Class 46) Switzerland Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property (IGE) reports progress in quest for improving legal protection for ‘Made in… [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 6:24 pm
By the twentieth century, America’s emerging regulatory state targeted “degenerates” and (later) “homosexuals. [read post]
