Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend" Results 221 - 240 of 420
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2013, 11:30 pm by Rumpole
A couple of rules to live by: You don't tug on superman's cape; you don't spit into the wind; and when the 3rd DCA tells you TWICE not to sentence a defendant as a Violent Career Criminal, you better damn well listen. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:52 am by Ken White
But critics don't tell us what the alternative should be. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:51 am by Bexis
  We don't like the "approach" approach because it would open the door to innovators being harassed and forced to take un-economic actions on drugs they no longer sell by generic manufacturers seeking to avoid liability. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 1:46 pm by Robert Hambrick
Now we know that even Federal plea agreements are rigged.The Judges have only the limited amount of discretion which prosecutors provide them by filing substantial assistance motions. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 9:09 am by Ken White
John Wells, defending the prosecution of Justin Carter, tells us that we need to act, that we need to take threats seriously, that we need to protect the general public, that we need to protect schoolchildren. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 10:47 am
Rather, it's precisely what the judge and lawyers and jurors are required to do. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
(This is even worse than the water supplier analogy, which just imposes requirements on citizens who don't compete with it.)This ITC majority says Samsung may seek an exclusion order against Apple's products because (even if Apple had proven its FRAND defense to the Administrative Law Judge) Samsung met its FRAND licensing obligation by making a new offer in December 2012 conditioned on Apple granting Samsung, under the deal, a license to its non-SEPs. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:55 am by Tamar Birckhead
 To which Justice Scalia responded, ""We don't want Miranda warnings to be given where they are unnecessary because they are only necessary to prevent coercion, and where there's no coercion, we want confessions, don't we?" [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:23 pm by Jeff Gamso
  We don't know.The thing is, it's easy to carp from where I sit. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 4:26 am by David DePaolo
The records ended up in the hands of five attorneys representing defendants in a U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm by Jeff Gamso
 I'll always vote to kill - unless the aggravating circumstances don't outweigh mitigation (which, and now mumbling they always do because the guy is dead and the defendant's a killer who, Q.E.D., should be killed.)It's a dance and a farce. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 3:30 am by John Day
We advance case expenses - sometimes hundreds of thousands of dollars in a single case - and don't get it back unless we win. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am by JB
We are reasonable people who believe in the democratic process (except, of course, when we don't).The problem is, no judge-- whether in the majority or the dissent-- will be able to avoid history's judgment. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
  Now, we all know, that wasn't, in fact, the case. [read post]