Search for: "Wells v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc." Results 221 - 240 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 8:01 am by Will Aitchison
is inconsistent with the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 5:10 am by Jim Shore
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., a Michigan federal district court ruled that an employee who was terminated by Wal-Mart after testing positive for validly obtained medical marijuana stated no legal claims for wrongful discharge. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:23 am by Doorey
While Wal-Mart faces substantial damages to the out-of-work employees in Jonquiere, the despairing fact is that, in the larger picture, this tactic appears to work: no Wal-Mart store in Canada today is unionized. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:37 am by Jon Gelman
May 01, 2012 Wal-Mart Stores Inc., headquartered in Bentonville, Ark., has agreed to pay $4,828,442 in back wages and damages to more than 4,500 employees nationwide following an investigation by the U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:36 am by John Elwood
Scott, 13-899, involves the discount store’s efforts to argue that under Wal Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Louis M. Solomon
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., No. 11-3639 (7th Cir. 2012), presents a careful analysis of two recurring issues:  first, whether the time limits for an interlocutory appeal of a class action order is statutory or jurisdiction on the one hand or something closer to discretionary on the other; and, second, what effect the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:40 pm by Allie
I’m not sure if you all heard about the recent Supreme Court decision, Wal-Mart Store, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:41 pm by Greg Mersol
The court expressed some concern over whether the claims could satisfy the Rule 23(a) requirement of commonality given the Supreme Court's decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 5:38 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
As we predicted here, the plaintiffs' class action bar is increasingly focused on re-booting their class action stratagems in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]