Search for: "Will Troutman (US)" Results 221 - 240 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2022, 9:41 am by Dave Maass
And every year since 2015, as we're about to crown these dubious winners, something new comes to light that makes us consider stopping the presses. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Turner was represented by Troutman Sanders partner Jim Lamberth. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The new rules may not go into effect until June, but might as well get used to the requirements now. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:13 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Therefore, the courts below correctly applied the negligence framework used for coworker conduct. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Asked whether the Court was in some way signaling federal agencies that it will be taking a closer look at significant changes in long-established administrative policies, Employment Law Daily advisory board member Richard Gerakitis (Troutman Sanders LLP) responded, “Actually, I think that SCOTUS gave us this signal back in Perez v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:06 am by Kevin LaCroix
A recent negotiated resolution of an FDIC failed bank lawsuit suggests disputes over D&O insurance coverage may represent the real frontline in the failed bank litigation wars. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:54 am by Rob Robinson
Also, there are eDiscovery organizations mentioned in the surveys, yet not highlighted in the eDiscovery-centric questions used for this aggregation. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am by Vanessa Vidal, Esq.
This is by no means all-inclusive; if your law firm should be included on the list, please let us know.COMPLETE LAYOFF LAW FIRM LIST FIRMS:Akerman SenterfittAkin GumpAllen & OveryAlston & BirdAndrew KurthArent FoxArnold & PorterBass BerryBaker & DanielsBaker & McKenzieBaker BottsBallard Spahr Andrews & IngersollBarlows Clyde & GilbertBell Boyd & LloydBilzin Sumberg Baena Price & AxelrodBingham McCutchenBlank RomeBose McKinney & EvansBradley Arant… [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 10:12 am
Many of you have asked us to note the firms that are not offering stipends. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:39 am by Joy Waltemath
Gerakitis saw no reason why the Board wouldn’t use Section 14(c)(1) as a basis for declining the case here. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:27 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The Court added that the fact that the law firm “now attempts to avoid the effects of that order by encouraging us to foist all responsibility for reimbursement onto its erstwhile clients, but we see no reason to accept that invitation. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 8:45 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
Gerakitis saw no reason why the Board wouldn’t use Section 14(c)(1) as a basis for declining the case here. [read post]