Search for: "Will v. People" Results 221 - 240 of 72,213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:00 am
Thousands of people driving while impaired on opioids or other narcotics are attracting the attention of law enforcement. [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Brian Connor
District Court for the District of Oregon to dismiss Juliana v. [read post]
2 May 2024, 3:23 pm
But the type of harshness you see here is not his usual forte.Four conduct has to really hack off the Court of Appeal to get an opinion like this one, and from a justice like this one, no less.Hopefully people will learn the underlying lesson. [read post]
2 May 2024, 1:03 pm
Justice Corrigan authors a powerful opinion that holds that it's not permissible for the police to conduct a Terry stop just because someone's in a high crime area and pretending to tie his shoe behind a car in order to avoid the police, and Justice Evan authors an equally powerful concurrence (joined by a majority of the Court) that highlights the racial implications of a rule that assumes that the "normal" response to a police encounter is to welcome and/or consent to… [read post]
2 May 2024, 9:37 am by Jiahang Li | JURIST Staff, CN
The next day, former president Álvaro Uribe Vélez responded, stating that the reform is not conducive to job creation and foreign investment and will affect young people adversely. [read post]
§ 4872(d)(2), which currently includes the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea, the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and the Islamic Republic of Iran. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
This act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day following the expiration of the 90 days after the final adjournment of the general assembly, except that if a referendum petition is filed under section 1 (3) of Article V of the state constitution against this act or an item, section, or part of this act within such period, then the act, item, section, or part will not take effect unless approved by the people at the general election to be held in. [read post]
That is why, even in a more traditional encampment context (e.g., camping in parks where overnight camping is permitted), regulators often impose limits on how close people can camp to sensitive environmental areas (such as waterways) and limits on how many people can occupy a camp, and for how long.Again, that interest, while not often discussed, would be seen to be of obvious importance near medical facilities, where clean [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:28 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
In a statement earlier Tuesday, University of California President Michael V. [read post]