Search for: "Williams v. Stephens" Results 221 - 240 of 1,275
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2020, 6:26 pm by Amy Howe
In 1975, Ginsburg argued at the Supreme Court on behalf of Stephen Wiesenfeld, who wanted to obtain Social Security benefits that would allow him to stay home with his young son after his wife, a schoolteacher, died in childbirth. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:30 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Geico “does not affect Williams’s precedent, as the facts of Gallagher are wholly distinguishable to the facts in the [Nationwide v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:30 am by Eugene Volokh
Circuit opinion by Judge Stephen Williams: For those familiar with 20th century history, such an order conjures up the system of "criticism-self-criticism" devised by Stalin and adopted by Mao. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 5:41 am by James Romoser
At Subscript Law, Mariam Morshedi has a new infographic report explaining Carney v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:58 am by SCOTUStalk
This is Tom Goldstein and Justice David Souter in Georgia v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 12:42 pm by Tia Sewell
Nathaniel Sobel and Julia Solomon Straus summarized the latest developments in Trump V. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Vendors of goods and services utilize standard form contracts to reduce or minimize transaction costs and to ensure consistency in the terms applied to similar transactions. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
” It is hard to imagine John Marshall or William Howard Taft exciting such passionate responses. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
In Law360, Stephen Calkins comments on the potential implications of two cases on which the court recently granted cert: AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
L.J. 63 (2020), Stephen Beemsterboer, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Law, Students. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 9:46 am by Stephen Griffin
  In the footnotes I mention the idea, advanced recently by William Baude and Stephen Sachs, that Brownwas in fact an originalist decision despite the Court’s apparent determination that historical evidence (a more neutral term than originalism) was no help.Baude and Sachs evidently disagree with my argument about Brown, but for all the work they have done to this point, it is not clear why. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]