Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 11:15 pm
In last week’s judgment in Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [2012] UKSC 22, the Supreme Court decided that the words ‘judicial authority’ in s 2(2) of the Extradition Act 2003 include prosecutors as well as courts. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:52 am
Appeal to the Supreme Court Tael’s appeal is due to be heard in the Supreme Court on 17 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
It would be fair to say that the House of Lords judgment in the joined appeals in Birmingham v Ali and Moran v Manchester [2009] UKHL 36 has come as something of surprise. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 11:32 am
The approach adopted by Lord Justice Patten was that the Court should give effect to the natural meaning of the words, unless this produced a result that was so extreme that it could not have been intended. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:15 am
Ever since Lord Diplcok's speech in Catnic v Hill & Smith [1981] FSR 60, [1982] RPC 183 (HL) we have been familiar with the idea of a purposive approach to interpreting patent claims - considering what the applicant had in mind, the spirit of the claims, rather than the precise words used. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 4:09 pm
Their words were “potentially defamatory and undoubtedly inflammatory”. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 7:31 am
Lord Reed emphasised that the only principles which allow for the plain meaning of a statute to be circumvented are (i) that statutory wording can be given a strained meaning to avoid absurd or perverse consequences and (ii) even greater stretching of plain wording can be allowed where there has been a clear drafting mistake. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Mott MacDonald Ltd v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:53 am
Lord Hoffmann once said, with reference to interpretation of contracts, that the “fundamental change which has overtaken this branch of the law” as a result of Lord Wilberforce’s speech in Prenn v Simmonds [1971] 1 WLR 1381 was not always “sufficiently appreciated”. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am
The Supreme Court’s reasoning was as follows: Non-disclosure of the commissions Lord Sumption held that the decision in Harrison v Black Horse Ltd, the leading Court of Appeal authority, was wrong. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 5:14 am
But the substance of Lord Lester’s objection depends on the judgment of Mr Justice Eady in the case of Mosley v News Group Newspapers ([2008] EWHC 1777 (QB)). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The House of Lords had previously thought that the scheme was lawful, in R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
The Supreme Court appeal The appeal was heard on 21 to 23 July 2015 by a panel of seven Supreme Court Justices comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
[1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am
As explained in paragraph 42 of this judgment, in paragraph 37 of Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9, Lord Hoffmann explained that the doctrine of equivalents had been developed in the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 3:49 am
As explained in paragraph 42 of this judgment, in paragraph 37 of Kirin-Amgen Inc v Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd [2005] RPC 9, Lord Hoffmann explained that the doctrine of equivalents had been developed in the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 4:20 pm
“The press provides an essential check on all aspects of public life,” were Lord Justice Leveson’s opening words to his Inquiry last Monday. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am
The appeal is set down for a one day hearing before Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:04 am
According to Lord Neuberger in Best Buy at para 18, this is an objective test. [read post]
