Search for: "Word v. Lord"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,054
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2021, 5:32 am
(In other words, there's a reason Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 6:11 am
= = = = = THOMPSON v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
Bentley v Bentley: Clothing beats Motors again in the Court of AppealBentley Motors Limited v (1) Bentley 1962 Limited (2) Brandlogic Limited [2020] EWCA Civ 1726 (December 2020) This was the first ever case featured in Retromark and turned up again in Volume 7. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:06 am
See Cairns v. [read post]
30 May 2021, 7:52 am
The complaint (full text) in Bridges v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
My reasons are as follows: (a) The word “maintained” in BL 86 is about the preservation of the continuity of the jury system. [read post]
21 May 2021, 5:14 am
The court’s analysis begins by referring to the principles of construction set out by Lord Hodge in Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24, noting that the process of construction will involve considering the words used in their “documentary, factual and commercial context. [read post]
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm
State of Hawaii is critiqued in the forthcoming University of Illinois Law Review Online article by George Mocsary and me, Errors of Omission: Words Missing from the Ninth Circuit's Young v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
Ltd v Knight Steamship Co. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 4:33 am
Google reviewed the relevant case law on CPR 19.6(1), arguing that the authorities (in particular, Emerald Supplies Ltd v British Airways plc [2011] Ch 345 and Rendlesham Estates plc. v Barr Ltd [2015] 1 WLR 3663) supported its position. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 9:00 pm
”[1] Protected subject matter as provided in § 102(a) of the Copyright Act includes: (i) literary works; (ii) musical works, including any accompanying words; (iii) dramatic works, including any accompanying music; (iv) pantomimes and choreographic works; (v) pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; (vi) motion pictures and other audiovisual works; (vii) sound recordings; and (viii) architectural works. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 1:49 am
This involves a consideration of the words used in their documentary, factual and commercial context. [read post]
20 Apr 2021, 10:47 pm
Lord no. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 12:43 am
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
Abramovich v Harper Collins, issued on 22 March 2021 Last Week in the Courts On 21 and 22 March 2021 Nicklin J heard a pre-trial review in the case of Hijazi v Yaxley-Lennon. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
The Court did not accept the claimant’s arguments that these passages of Lord Hope and Lady Hale in Birmingham v Ali did not apply to the grant of mandatory relief, or that they were limited to situations where suitability was disputed. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 10:22 am
The test for passing off is set out in Lord Oliver’s judgment in Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 and the present case turned on whether the defendants (counterclaimants) had goodwill in the word. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 10:22 am
The test for passing off is set out in Lord Oliver’s judgment in Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 and the present case turned on whether the defendants (counterclaimants) had goodwill in the word. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am
The Secretary of State maintained that the Supreme Court decisions in R (Unison) v. [read post]
