Search for: "Wright v. State of California"
Results 221 - 240
of 405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), after four years of litigation, shifted its strategy in its banner NSA case, Jewel v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Last year, in United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Since the Supreme Court has observed, first in the seminal case of Pennhurst State School & Hospital v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
Background on the King v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
United States and Printz v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 9:02 pm
The issue before the Court in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 3:38 pm
Wright v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
Department of Transportation v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
One interesting case to be argued in a couple of months, Elonis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
After losing in the trial and appellate courts, petitioners seek cert. on the issue of “[w]hether the Commerce Clause allows California to impose a complete ban on the sale of wholesome USDA-approved poultry products from other States and countries … based solely on the agricultural methods used by out-of-state farmers who raise their animals entirely beyond California’s borders. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court wrote its Hollingsworth v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:55 am
On September 8, Judge Wright from the Central District of California dismissed Plaintiff Deckers Outdoor Corporation’s trade-dress infringement claim against retailer J.C. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
And in situations like these, the Supreme Court has held, in a somewhat well-known 1977 case, Marks v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
Suppose the California Supreme Court (the ultimate interpreter of State law) were to rule that search and seizure protections under the California Constitution do not extend to automobiles. [read post]
