Search for: "YOUNGS v. CASE"
Results 221 - 240
of 9,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2010, 12:44 pm
Yolanda Young v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 10:55 pm
Pedley v Director of Public Prosecutions 2010 (QBD) (Meaning of ‘Children’s Playground’) D breached a Sexual Offences Prevention Order by observing young people playing in a skate park. [read post]
11 Nov 2020, 4:01 pm
Then in its 2012 Miller v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:00 am
Rakofsky v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 3:25 pm
The decision in Bearden v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 4:36 pm
Young, 64 M.J. 404 (C.A.A.F. 2007); United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 6:01 am
This year's Young EPLAW Congress kicked off with a UPC moot, eagerly attended by 19 budding advocates. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:54 pm
On January 28, 2009, the Court denied motions field by the Fieger law firm to disqualify Justices Corrigan, Markman, and Young from participating in Pellegrino v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:52 am
The case, Virginia Office of Protection and Advocacy v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:58 am
Ct. 1523 (2013), comes a new Second Circuit decision heralding the slow strangulation of Fair Labor Standards Act cases: Sutherland v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 2:27 am
Merton London Borough Council v Sinclair Collis Ltd [2010] WLR (D) 286 “Notwithstanding the civil complaint procedure embodied in s 7(2) of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 (as amended), a sale of tobacco to a person under the age of 18 through a cigarette vending machine was capable of being an offence contrary to s 7(1) of the 1933 Act. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
Maggie, another student in our case, wants to vote for candidates who will act on climate change. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:36 am
In this case, the trial court awarded custody of the parties’ young son to the father. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 12:46 pm
Criminal law — Sufficiency of the evidence — Unauthorized removal of property In this case a sixty-two year old man was savagely and senselessly beaten by a gang of young men in a series of attacks initiated by the appellant, Derrick Jamar Thompson, then age twenty. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 5:41 pm
The reasoning lies in the case of Young v. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 1:28 pm
In this particular case, it could help the young attorneys involved with the Illumina v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 2:19 pm
Utah rule, to satisfy the three-year time limitation in Section 13 of the Securities Act with respect to the claims of putative class members To discuss the case, we have Paul Stancil, who is Professor of Law at Brigham Young University. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Tuttle v. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The decision will therefore benefit many other young people like the appellant who have been living in the UK since a young age. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:54 am
United States v. [read post]