Search for: "v. Ball et al"
Results 221 - 234
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2007, 6:47 am
MIPS Technologies Inc et al. (2:2007-cv-00515), where 91 defendants were named. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:44 am
• In Ex Parte Kinzhalin et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 10:00 pm
Compliance and regulations: The post-Enron proliferation of government regulations (Sarbanes-Oxley Act et al.) has changed the way corporations process electronic data. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 11:37 am
For publication opinions today (1): In Indiana Department of Transportation, et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 3:30 am
Bush et al., a 2006 case filed in the Eastern District of Philadelphia. [read post]
18 May 2007, 12:03 pm
Spruit, Raymond Ton, Jr., Jim Van Laere, et al. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:55 pm
Zogarts case (534 P.2d 377 (Cal. 1975)) in David Owen et al.'s Products Liability and Safety casebook and possibly others. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 11:45 am
While Goldstein et al. aren't infallible, this does suggest that I have been looking at the world through olive-drab-colored glasses. [read post]
30 Mar 2007, 11:37 am
LDS Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a I&I Steakhouse, et al, a 14-page opinion, Judge May writes:Kayla Hughes was killed in an automobile accident after she spent some time at I&I Steakhouse, a restaurant owned by LDC Enterprises. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Solomon introduced a bill that eventually became the Solomon Amendment [8], mandating, in part, that military recruiters not be denied access to campuses lest the entire university be cut off from funding derived from the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, et al. [9],[10]. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Dippin' Dots, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2005, 1:58 am
Microsoft, et al. left me scratching my head.After spending considerable time construing the claims of the patent in suit, the District Court concluded on summary judgment that some claims were invalid and that none were infringed. [read post]
14 Feb 2005, 11:19 pm
Darryl Green, et al., 343 F.Supp.2d 23 (D.Mass. 2004), Criminal No. 02-10301-NG (D.Mass, Nov. 3, 2004), which we posted on here, and here. [read post]
15 Jun 2004, 11:47 am
The emphasis is therefore on its being a distraction, something that gives pleasure (see ‘Sports Law' by Gardiner et al (Cavendish, 1998). [read post]
