Search for: "Action Communications Inc" Results 2381 - 2400 of 10,898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2017, 8:39 am by Eric Goldman
§ 223, does not provide Smith with a private right of action. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 6:52 am by Joy Waltemath
A hotel chain was denied a motion to dismiss a class action suit alleging that it invaded employees’ rights by installing a new telephone system that allowed it to listen and record telephone calls to its reservation desk without first informing the reservation clerks. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 11:46 pm
America Online, Inc., 129 F.3d 327 (4th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 524 U.S. 937 (1998). [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 7:08 am by Eric Goldman
GitHub, Inc. is one of the first major class-action lawsuits to dive into questions of online collection of “public data” and generative AI training data sets. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm
Facebook, Inc., 173 N.H. 442, 450 (2020) (quotation omitted); see Universal Communication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Code 40.325, or Rule 504-1, provides a patient, in a civil action, a privilege to refuse to disclose confidential communications with her physician. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Code 40.325, or Rule 504-1, provides a patient, in a civil action, a privilege to refuse to disclose confidential communications with her physician. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 11:19 am
Dart Industries, Inc. (1981) 29 Cal.3d 462, 470-471. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 9:05 am
Readers may remember this dispute as Sun Microsystems Inc v M-Tech Data Ltd and another (noted by the IPKat here), but it has resurfaced today -- at a time when Court of Appeal judges should be out in the sun, not judging it -- as Oracle America Inc (formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd and Lichtenstein [2010] EWCA Civ 997. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 8:58 am
The class action we filed against Swift Meatpacking survived the defendant's motion to dismiss. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Seyfarth Shaw
McKessy said that he reads the Rule as stating that “no person shall take any action” to impede an individual from communicating directly with the SEC. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
Next, Hadeed had to show that the communications made were tortious or illegal, or that it had a legitimate, good-faith reason for claiming that the communication is actionable. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Robert Welch, Inc., [418 U.S. 323 (1974)]: We need not define ‘actual injury,’ as trial courts have wide experience in framing appropriate jury instructions in tort actions. [read post]